My friends and I have fun coming up with all sorts of hair-brained schemes for crops, both utilizing resources we’re aware of that are currently unutilized, or recombining traits to package them in a way to make them useful. I think we’re all dreamers.
I don’t think that’s necessarily a bad thing:
“Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.”
George Bernard Shaw
In a sense you can’t help but to change the world. It’s known as “the Butterfly Effect” (ie, the flapping of the butterfly’s wings influences the weather): small differences in initial conditions result in huge changes in outcome over time. The question is how to make those changes that make the world a better place.
I would like to start a project to grow out crops that are currently not utilized at all, or are under-utilized compared with what we think is their potential, and then identify obstacles to utilization and ways to work around those.
I have at least one specific objective in mind:
Identifying crops that can make local production possible where otherwise it is not
For example, hardy substitutes for tropical commodities, or easy-to-grow backyard substitutes for strictly commercial crops.
That’s sort of what we’re already about anyway; we make local production possible including of a number of staple crops rarely grown anymore other than in large-scale globalized plantation operations.
For that very reason, though, we need to make sure that our core business is getting enough attention before we experiment with crops that will take time and effort, that we’re not even sure there’s a market for. The photo by the way is of …
“…a demonstration site, embodying the principles of permaculture and perennial polyculture systems from around the world. It is a community-based garden that displays the dynamic relationship that humans have with nature”.
(That’s what the sign says)
I don’t mean to rain on someone else’s parade and I have a feeling I will be stepping on toes, but it needs to be pointed out that this project lacks credibility: the most common of plants in this “permaculture and perennial polyculture system” are mildly to extremely toxic to all mammals, while others are merely indigestible.
One of the less toxic inhabitants is Russian comfrey. I looked up online if there’s any actual use for it. Wikipedia states that it has essentially replaced comfrey and says of it:
Contemporary herbalists view comfrey as an ambivalent and controversial herb that may offer therapeutic benefits but can cause liver toxicity.
One of the country names for comfrey was ‘knitbone’, a reminder of its traditional use in healing bone fractures. Modern science confirms that comfrey can influence the course of bone ailments.
The herb contains allantoin, a cell proliferant that speeds up the natural replacement of body cells. Comfrey was used in an attempt to treat a wide variety of ailments ranging from bronchial problems, broken bones, sprains, arthritis, gastric and varicose ulcers, severe burns, acne and other skin conditions. It was reputed to have bone and teeth building properties in children, and have value in treating “many female disorders”. Constituents of comfrey also include mucilage, steroidal saponins, tannins, pyrrolizidine alkaloids, inulin, and proteins.
Internal usage of comfrey should be avoided because it contains hepatotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs). Use of comfrey can, because of these PAs, lead to veno-occlusive disease (VOD). VOD can in turn lead to liver failure, and comfrey, taken in extreme amounts, has been implicated in at least one death.[6] In 2001, the United States Food and Drug Administration issued a warning against internal usage of herbal products containing comfrey.[7] There are ways to remove the pyrrolizidine alkaloids from comfrey, and some herbal product manufacturers have begun doing so (although the products will still be labelled “for external use only”).
Excessive doses of symphytine, one of the PAs in comfrey, may cause cancer in rats.[8] This was shown by injection of the pure alkaloid. The whole plant has also been shown to induce precancerous changes in rats.
So it might be medicinal in some context that is not clear at the moment, but it’s not food and probably doesn’t make sense for it to be one of the main crops. Medicinal herbs I’ll cover in another blog post another day. I’m not sure how it’s supposed to get to your bones to knit them if you can only apply it externally. There may be some bugs to work out on this one.
The Hedge Morning Glory (Calystegia sepium) is edible but I’m not convinced anyone is really eating it. Young dandelion is probably more palatable.
So, we tread cautiously and rationally into unknown territory, where be dragons. Here are some ideas:
- Fruits adapted to colder or more maritime climates than is typical of most tree crops. Also, preferably, that do not require expensive and labor-intensive grafting.
- Wild and semi-domesticated crops that are tough enough to grow more-or-less feral, but good enough to be practical for human tastes, as emergency backup food; this becomes more critical the more reliant you are on local food versus being able to buy imports
- Herbs and spices that are not tropical
- Long, strong plant-fibers that are not tropical
- Long-season, non-bolting greens that are not tropical
Some projects not quite fitting any of those categories, but still relevant to localizing production, would include Tom’s high-protein potato project and my frost-resistant potato project.
“High protein” for a potato just means that it has something like 40% more protein than a typical potato; these aren’t soy. The thing is tho that they’re a lot easier to grow in usable quantities in a backyard than soy is. Potato protein also happens to be quite good quality; it’s the quantity that’s lacking, but only relative to the calories; on an acreage basis potatoes are quite generous as protein-makers. Eat them skin and all–the protein is all concentrated in the then waxy layer right under the skin.
The idea for a frost-resistant potato is to take advantage of the fact that potatoes are easy-to-grow and surprisingly adaptable to high latitudes despite their highland tropical origins, EXCEPT that unfortunately most of them have practically no frost tolerance in the foliage.
If a frost hits, the “seed potato” (as a dealer in true potato seeds, that expression is exasperating to me) might survive in the shelter of the earth, but the foliage gets nipped back–possible too much to recover from, or at least the potatoes will be set back (but potatoes are remarkably forgiving). For growing them in places like Alaska, Montana, Finland, and even Minnesota, it would be worthwhile to have potatoes whose foliage can survive at least a mild frost. Combining that with early tuberization needed for the shorter growing season would get you a potato that is more resistant to crop failure at high latitudes–which someday soon I think will be a matter of much higher stakes than it is at the moment with the possibility of bought imported crops as a backup. Just a small difference in frost tolerance and precocious tuberization makes a huge difference in crop reliability.
In order to implement the project, I would need to organize local people willing to make a commitment to contribute labor and resources to it in consideration of their share of the food produced. I would front the land and some inputs including some transportation to and from the farm.
I’m not sure that conditions exist to make it work. When economic times are good, this type of project is a hobby people dabble in, hence the anonymous project mentioned earlier. That’s what I don’t want to replicate; there is room for failed experiments but not for a total waste of precious time, money, and resources. When times are hard as they are just starting to become (sorry, the worst is yet to come), it’s every man for himself. I point out that if you can’t find full-time employment at “living wages” then you cut down your expenses by using your free time to produce some of your own goods, to cut down on what you need money to buy in the first place. I actually know a few brave but sensible people doing this.
For me, local food production is not an abstract or ideological concept; it’s a matter of practical necessity as global finance breaks down and production is going into decline in many key crops. Already a number of countries have had food riots because they became dependent on imports of cheap wheat. Now that wheat prices have more than doubled, and because food purchases were already a high ratio of typical family budgets, people are going hungry and going broke in these countries.
I know of at least 2 of the countries that have been hit by food riots that have plenty of capacity to not only grow more than enough food for their populations, there would be enough to export, but they don’t. Instead, they’re bogged down with lack of farmers, chronic capital depletion (they “eat their seed corn”) so they can’t just mechanize it, and corruption (loans for farm equipment, seed, and fertilizer end up paying for an unearned luxury lifestyle for the ruling class).
We have the same problems on some scale. We’re next. Is there enough time left to ramp up local production? What could we come up with successful local substitutes for?
What do you think?